Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 33(11): 1107-35, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26048354

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The economics of dengue is complex and multifaceted. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review of the literature to provide a critical overview of the issues related to dengue economics research and to form a background with which to address the question of cost. METHODS: Three literature databases were searched [PubMed, Embase and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS)], covering a period from 1980 to 2013, to identify papers meeting preset inclusion criteria. Studies were reviewed for methodological quality on the basis of a quality checklist developed for this purpose. An expert survey was designed to identify priority areas in dengue economics research and to identify gaps between the methodology and actual practice. Survey responses were combined with the literature review findings to determine stakeholder priorities in dengue economics research. RESULTS: The review identified over 700 papers. Forty-two of these papers met the selection criteria. The studies that were reviewed presented results from 32 dengue-endemic countries, underscoring the importance of dengue as a global public health problem. Cost analyses were the most common, with 21 papers, followed by nine cost-effectiveness analyses and seven cost-of-illness studies, indicating a relatively strong mix of methodologies. Dengue annual overall costs (in 2010 values) ranged from US$13.5 million (in Nicaragua) to $56 million (in Malaysia), showing cost variations across countries. Little consistency exists in the way costs were estimated and dengue interventions evaluated, making generalizations around costs difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that dengue costs are substantial because of the cost of hospital care and lost earnings. Further research in this area will broaden our understanding of the true economic impact of dengue.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/economia , Dengue/economia , Saúde Pública/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dengue/terapia , Humanos
2.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 34(3): 198-203, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24233113

RESUMO

A workshop with 20 experts of diverse backgrounds from five countries in the Americas was convened for two-and-a-half days in March 2012 to discuss and develop a standardized methodology for assessing the economic cost of dengue. This article discusses a number of factors that contributed to the workshop's success, including: engaging the experts at various stages of the process; convening a multidisciplinary group to reduce expert bias and provide a more comprehensive and integrated approach; facilitating guided small- and large-group discussions; developing effective cross-cultural collectivism, trust, communication, and empathy across the expert panel; establishing clear lines of responsibilities within each group of experts; breaking down the complex issues into smaller and simpler ideas; providing ample background materials in multiple languages prior to the workshop. Challenges and areas for improvement are also covered.


Assuntos
Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Consenso , Dengue/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Região do Caribe , Comunicação , Cultura , Prova Pericial , Objetivos , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Cooperação Internacional , Idioma , América Latina , Manuais como Assunto , Responsabilidade Social
3.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 34(3): 198-203, Sep. 2013. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-690809

RESUMO

A workshop with 20 experts of diverse backgrounds from five countries in the Americas was convened for two-and-a-half days in March 2012 to discuss and develop a standardized methodology for assessing the economic cost of dengue. This article discusses a number of factors that contributed to the workshop's success, including: engaging the experts at various stages of the process; convening a multidisciplinary group to reduce expert bias and provide a more comprehensive and integrated approach; facilitating guided small- and large-group discussions; developing effective cross-cultural collectivism, trust, communication, and empathy across the expert panel; establishing clear lines of responsibilities within each group of experts; breaking down the complex issues into smaller and simpler ideas; providing ample background materials in multiple languages prior to the workshop. Challenges and areas for improvement are also covered.


Se convocó un taller con 20 expertos provenientes de diversos ámbitos de cinco países de las Américas con el propósito de analizar y elaborar un método normalizado de evaluación del costo económico del dengue; la duración del taller fue de dos días y medio en marzo del 2012. En el presente artículo se analizan diversos factores que contribuyeron al éxito del taller, entre ellos la vinculación de los expertos en diversas.


Assuntos
Humanos , Consenso , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Dengue/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Região do Caribe , Comunicação , Cultura , Prova Pericial , Objetivos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Cooperação Internacional , Idioma , América Latina , Manuais como Assunto , Responsabilidade Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...